The Alliance Problem: How to Build With Other Leaders Without Destroying Each Other

Back to Blog

A few years ago, I sat across from two leaders at a regional event. They were in the same company, same market, both running teams of roughly a thousand people. On paper, they should have been allies. They shared a compensation plan, a product line, and a common interest in growing the business in their country. Instead, they could barely look at each other.

The tension was not about business strategy or leadership philosophy. It was personal. One had made a passing comment at a company event that the other interpreted as a slight against their team's training methods. That single remark had metastasised over six months into a full-blown cold war — separate chat groups, coded public speeches designed to undermine each other, and team members caught in the crossfire unsure whose side they were supposed to be on.

I had a unique vantage point at the time because I was on the corporate side. I could see what neither of them could: while they were busy fighting each other, both their organisations were bleeding. Their best people were quietly leaving — not because of the products, or the compensation plan, or the market conditions — but because the environment had become toxic. The leaders were so consumed by a war with each other that they had stopped paying attention to the people who depended on them.

That experience stayed with me, because it was not an isolated incident. I have seen this pattern repeat across multiple companies, multiple markets, over more than two decades. And it has led me to a conclusion that I believe is one of the most underappreciated truths in our industry: the relationships between peer leaders — crossline, sideline, whatever your company calls them — are one of the most powerful forces shaping long-term success, and almost nobody treats them with the seriousness they deserve.

The Relationship Nobody Talks About

We talk endlessly about upline-downline relationships. How to lead your team. How to support your people. How to develop emerging leaders beneath you. There are books, courses, and entire conferences dedicated to these vertical relationships, and rightly so — they are the backbone of any direct selling organisation.

But the horizontal relationships — the ones between you and the other leaders at your level, the ones who are not in your direct line but who operate in the same ecosystem — these are treated as an afterthought. At best, they are casual acquaintances you see at events. At worst, they are competitors you eye with suspicion.

This is a strategic blind spot. Because the truth is that the leaders around you — the ones building parallel organisations in the same company, the same market, sometimes even the same city — have an enormous influence on your trajectory, whether you acknowledge it or not. When those relationships are healthy, they create a rising tide that lifts every team. When they are dysfunctional, they create a drag that pulls everyone down.

I have experienced this from both sides. As a field builder, I felt the impact of crossline dynamics on my team's morale and growth. As a corporate director, I saw the data — and the data was unambiguous. Markets where peer leaders cooperated grew faster and retained better than markets where they were at war with each other. It was not even close.

Three Toxic Patterns

Over the years, I have identified three destructive patterns that poison peer-leader relationships. They are worth naming, because you cannot fix what you refuse to see.

The first is silent competition. This is the most common and the most subtle. Two leaders in the same market never openly conflict. They smile at each other on stage. They shake hands at events. But beneath the surface, everything is a comparison. Who grew more this quarter. Whose team got more recognition. Who the company seems to favour. This silent scorekeeping corrodes the relationship slowly, like rust. It manifests in small ways — a failure to share a useful insight that could help the other leader's team, a reluctance to collaborate on events, a quiet satisfaction when the other leader stumbles. It never becomes open warfare, but it prevents the kind of genuine cooperation that could benefit both organisations enormously.

The second is public undermining. This is more overt and more damaging. It happens when a leader makes comments — on stage, in team chats, on social media — that are designed to diminish another leader's credibility or approach. Sometimes it is direct: criticising another leader's training methods or questioning their results. More often, it is indirect: praising your own approach in terms that implicitly position the other leader's methods as inferior. 'We do things the right way here' is a sentence I have heard dozens of times, and it almost always carries an unspoken comparison. The damage from public undermining extends far beyond the two leaders involved. It creates a culture of faction and suspicion that infects every person in both organisations. Team members start viewing the other leader's people as adversaries rather than colleagues. The collaborative spirit that makes company events powerful is replaced by tribal loyalty and defensive posturing.

The third is poaching. This is the most destructive of all, and the one that causes the deepest and most lasting damage. When a leader actively or passively recruits people from another leader's team — whether within the same company or by luring them to a different opportunity — they are not just taking individuals. They are destroying the foundational trust that makes the entire ecosystem function. I have seen poaching escalate into full organisational crises. I have seen it end careers. And I have never — not once in twenty-three years — seen a leader who built something sustainable through poaching. The people you attract through disloyalty will leave you through disloyalty. It is only a matter of time.

Cooperative Competition

Here is what the strongest organisations understand that the weakest ones do not: peer leaders are not your competitors. The market is your competitor. Attrition is your competitor. Public scepticism of the industry is your competitor. The leader building a team across town is, or should be, your ally in a much larger fight.

I call the ideal dynamic cooperative competition. It means you push each other to be better while simultaneously protecting each other from external threats. You compete in the sense that you are both striving for excellence, and the presence of another strong leader raises your own standards. But you cooperate in the sense that you share insights, support each other's events, and refuse to let petty rivalries undermine the broader ecosystem you both depend on.

The best analogy I have found is from professional sports. Elite athletes in the same league compete fiercely on the field. But they also understand that the health of the league itself — its reputation, its audience, its sponsors — is in everyone's interest. A footballer does not want the opposing team to fold. They want the opposing team to be strong, because a strong league benefits every player in it. The leaders who grasp this principle build organisations that endure. The leaders who treat every peer as a threat build organisations that are perpetually at war on too many fronts.

Sun Tzu understood this intuitively. One of his most fundamental strategic principles is the danger of fighting on multiple fronts simultaneously. An army that must defend against enemies on all sides is an army that cannot concentrate its strength on any single objective. It is stretched thin, reactive, and perpetually exhausted. This is precisely what happens to a leader who turns every peer relationship into a battlefield. Your energy is divided. Your focus is scattered. And while you are busy watching your flanks, you neglect the one front that actually matters — building and serving your own team.

Practical Boundaries

Cooperative competition requires boundaries. You cannot be naive about this. Not every leader shares your values, and not every leader will reciprocate your goodwill. The question is not whether to engage with peer leaders — you must — but how to do so wisely.

There are things worth sharing freely. General market insights. Training philosophies. Event logistics. Encouragement during difficult seasons. These cost you nothing to give, and they build the relational capital that makes the broader ecosystem stronger. When another leader's team is thriving, it validates the entire opportunity in the eyes of prospects and the public. Their success is not your loss.

There are things worth protecting. The specific systems and processes you have developed for your team. The personal relationships you have built with your people. The trust that your team members have placed in you. These are not secrets born of paranoia — they are the intellectual and relational property that you have built through years of effort. Sharing them indiscriminately is not generosity. It is poor stewardship.

And then there is the hardest question: what do you do when a peer leader operates with different ethical standards than you do?

I wish I could tell you there is a clean answer. There is not. What I can tell you is this: you do not lower your standards to match theirs, and you do not wage a public campaign against them. Both paths lead to damage — to you, to your team, and to the broader organisation. Instead, you maintain your standards visibly and consistently. You let the contrast speak for itself. You document concerns through proper channels when warranted. And you protect your people by building a culture so strong that the temptation to follow a less ethical leader elsewhere holds no appeal.

From the corporate side, I can tell you that companies notice the difference. They may not always act as quickly as you would like, but they see the patterns. The leader who builds quietly and ethically while another leader burns through people creates a data trail that is impossible to ignore over time. Patience is not passivity. It is strategy.

The Alliance Mindset

If I could give one piece of advice to every leader reading this, it would be this: approach your peer-leader relationships with the same intentionality you bring to your team relationships. Do not leave them to chance. Do not assume they will take care of themselves. And do not make the catastrophic error of treating every peer as a rival by default.

Reach out to the leaders in your market. Have a conversation — not about tactics or numbers, but about values. Find out what kind of leaders they aspire to be. Look for common ground. Where you find alignment, invest in the relationship. Where you find misalignment, establish boundaries with respect. Not every peer leader will become your close ally. But most of them can become, at minimum, a respectful co-builder in the same ecosystem rather than an adversary.

The leaders I most admire in this industry — the ones whose organisations have survived market shifts, company transitions, and the inevitable storms that every long career encounters — almost all have strong peer-leader networks. They have people at their level they can call when things get hard. People who understand the unique pressures of leading a large organisation because they are living those pressures too. People who will tell them the truth when their own team members might not.

That kind of alliance is rare, and it is invaluable. You cannot build it overnight. But you can begin building it today, one honest conversation at a time.

The strongest generals in history did not conquer alone. They built alliances that allowed them to focus their strength where it mattered most, instead of scattering their forces across unnecessary battles. The same principle applies to building in this industry. Choose your battles wisely. Protect your flanks through relationships, not through hostility. And never forget that the leader building alongside you is not the enemy — the enemy is everything that threatens to undermine the work you are both trying to do.

“He who has to fight on many fronts at once will exhaust his strength before any single battle is won. The wise general secures his alliances before he marches to war.” — Adapted from Sun Tzu